A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- RT @SydneyHEMS: Sharing education and experience in PHARM with @acemonline trainees in NSW. Thank you to @NswHeti for supporting today’s zo… 2 days ago
- Sharing education and experience in PHARM with @acemonline trainees in NSW. Thank you to @NswHeti for supporting to… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 2 days ago
- RT @onthewardsorg: #juniordoctors can feel apprehensive doing a rural rotation. What can you do to help prepare a pt for retrieval or when… 2 days ago
- One of the most valuable tools we have is to learn from the experience of others. Thank you for sharing your major… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- A team that trains together........ https://t.co/68yoiRy1gi 1 week ago