A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- RT @cliffreid: The first published evaluation of @zeropointsurvey by @erin_donnelly1 & @EMManchester Thank you my friends for this import… 11 hours ago
- RT @BradHazzard: @NSWAmbulance AW139 helicopter approaches cliff in bush land to lower stretcher to base of cliff in a training exercise.… 1 day ago
- RT @cliffreid: @NGParkes83 @a3cordier Yes @SydneyHEMS we’ll run it peripherally until we’ve placed a CVC or if time critical transfer we’ll… 2 days ago
- RT @DobbieAnna: It’s out!! The advert for Physicians in Pre Hospital Care with London HEMS is now live! Looking forward to receiving your… 5 days ago
- RT @cliffreid: If you want a lesson on mindset and a demonstration of determination & resilience, read EM doctor Dinesh Palipana's book Str… 6 days ago
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.