A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- Everything ECMO – Part Two by @_NMay sydneyhems.com/2017/12/08/eve… 1 day ago
- RT @RAGEpodcast: The latest RAGE Session is now live! Featuring @karelhabig, @cliffreid, and @precordialthump #foamed #foamcc https://t.co… 2 days ago
- Combined Education and Clinical Governance Day Christmas Special -13th December sydneyhems.com/2017/12/08/com… 5 days ago
- Everything ECMO part 1 by @_NMay Contains videos from our ECMO training day @GomorraDoc @AmyGospel sydneyhems.com/2017/12/08/eve… 5 days ago
- RT @jonmcck: Yes… prehospital "paediatric advanced airway management is no more challenging than adult advanced airway management”…in a ser… 6 days ago