A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- Joint HEMS/NETS Education Day 12th December sydneyhems.com/2018/12/06/joi… https://t.co/wxMbF6mN0S 4 days ago
- RT @HawkmoonHEMS: 9 year review of 164 ECMO retrieval transports in Australia. Survival to discharge 68%. #ecmo researchgate.net/publication/32… 4 days ago
- RT @aldondelport: If 1 in 300 RSI's are difficult airways doi.org/10.1093/bja/ae… here's a few thousand RSI's worth of experience for ya ht… 1 week ago
- RT @tollambulance: At 8am and 8pm there is daily briefing for the crew. This allows the team to communicate operational information like we… 1 week ago
- RT @cliffreid: Viewing our videos and reading the learning points each month is a great way to increase your mental database of different a… 2 weeks ago