A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- Helmet removal and lessons from motorcycle racing @CruaFear https://t.co/cXwaCLsGKN 1 week ago
- RT @wildernessmd: Thanks @SydneyHEMS for having me back to Oz to talk about #helicoptersafety in the #HEMS environment. Confronting but imp… 1 month ago
- RT @tollambulance: Massive shout out to Michael Novy who celebrated 20 years with the @NSWAmbulance Service. He is currently working at th… 1 month ago
- RT @Sophie_Shand: With Retrieval Transfusion Protocol as part of expert prehospital critical care, @SydneyHEMS are delivering patients to… 1 month ago
- The medical team treating a critically injured patient @AusTrauma #AusTrauma19 - ZPS, TCA, RTP in observed action https://t.co/Aor3E4PXWS 1 month ago