A cadaveric study using a 3-dimensional electromagnetic tracking device to asses cervical motion compared the application of a scoop stretcher with two other manual transfer techniques, including log rolling onto an extrication (spine) board. The scoop method restricted cervical spine movement more than log rolling, although this was not statistically significant.
The authors conclude: the effectiveness of the scoop stretcher to limit spinal motion in the destabilized spine is comparable or better than manual techniques currently being used by primary responders.
Are scoop stretchers suitable for use on spine-injured patients?
Am J Emerg Med. 2010 Sep;28(7):751-6
- RT @tollambulance: No matter how you look at it, the @SydOperaHouse makes for spectacular viewing, even for our @NSWAmbulance & Toll Rescue… 1 hour ago
- RT @elmsy1664: Really happy to see the team working hard with @bob_jarman @SonoSiteEurope as we move to CCP ELS. Support from both has been… 14 hours ago
- RT @BBCRadioLondon: Latest: @LDNairamb says for the first time it attended more stabbings and shootings last year than traffic accidents. T… 3 days ago
- Celebrating #InternationalWomensDay with a hat tip to all the #FEMinPHARM https://t.co/INv9DtSHuk 1 week ago
- RT @EM_Jennn: NorCal Sim Wars burn case. Escharotomy model from @SydneyHEMS. @IanMJulie @SageTankboy. Thanks @RomanMicek for the moulage he… 1 week ago